Liljefors had begun his studies at the Academy in 1879, where he met Anders Zorn, his contemporary but already with several years of study behind him. Zorn wished to leave the Academy, and Liljefors soon agreed with him. Neither of them could see any benefit in drawing from plaster casts of antiquities. Moreover, naked guardsmen made poor models—particularly if one wished to paint foxes, as Zorn pointed out to Liljefors. Liljefors did, however, seem to appreciate P.D. Holm, the teacher of landscape painting—perhaps naturally, given that Holm had once considered becoming an animal painter himself and had also trained as a taxidermist. Later, however, Liljefors stated that he had learned more from his fellow student Zorn than from the Academy’s professors. K.E. Russow recounts the following memory in Bruno Liljefors. A Study (1929):
“Liljefors readily acknowledges that he has much to thank his companions for, especially Anders Zorn, with whom he often exchanged thoughts about the art of painting. Zorn was the first among his companions fully to dare trust the maxim: if the tonal values are correct, one believes oneself to see the real details. Liljefors once recounted with great humour how he had meticulously painted a fox; Zorn also saw the painting and gave the verdict: ‘He looks as if the hairs had been glued onto him.’ He took a pad of drawing paper and painted something on it with plenty of watercolour and abundant water. During the conversation he balanced the pad seemingly carelessly back and forth so that Liljefors thought he was joking, but when the sheet was dry, one could see a masterfully painted fox pelt. Liljefors admits that this demonstration, which clearly showed ‘how one must see a subject’, made a deep impression on him.”
To the Catalogue